Service of a Well-Meaning Initiative That Creates More Problems than it Solves
Thursday, April 27th, 2023

Image by Stanly8853 from Pixabay
As a person blessed with many advantages, I’m all for leveling the playing field. I have for years supported college scholarship initiatives for example and charities best I can.
Yet so many negative thoughts or images came to mind when I heard about the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s changes that kick in May 1 that will impact mortgages. I think that while the agency attempts to help some, it will result in creating resentment and more divisiveness between people of different income levels than already exists. I struggled with economics in college. If the finest financial minds came up with this initiative, it’s clear I’d have similar problems were I to take the course today. It’s counterintuitive.
What am I rambling on about? “A new federal rule could raise the monthly mortgage payments of buyers with good credit scores by over $60 a month, while riskier borrowers will get more favorable terms because their fees will be reduced,” Katherine Fung wrote in Newsweek.
The parable of the prodigal son came to mind and while I know I should root for him, I have always empathized with the hard-working older brother who wasn’t celebrated. Next, I envisioned the child who gobbles his ice cream cone while a parent demands the other kids give him a few licks from their treats that remain only because they have taken their time to make theirs last.
Fung reported: “Only about 25 percent of homebuyers with Federal Housing Administration loans are people of color, according to the White House. Black and Hispanic people, on average, have fewer savings to use as a down payment on a home and tend to have lower credit scores, according to David Stevens, former CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) and a former FHA commissioner during the Obama administration. The current policy is being rolled out by the FHFA.”
She wrote: “The effort to get more low-income Americans and Americans of color into homeownership is essentially being subsidized by borrowers who have better credit scores and can contribute more to their down payment, Michael Borodinsky, a vice president at Caliber Home Loans, told Newsweek.”
I want to know: Why is home ownership the Holy Grail? To maintain a home costs a lot of money. The down payment and mortgage are only the beginning. If the furnace, roof, washing machine and dryer hold together one year, the plumbing, lawnmower, chimney, or deck can give out the next. Like a fur coat or printer, the initial cost is just the start: One needs to pay for cold storage for the former while the latter devours costly cartridges.
I am an anomaly. I’ve been equally happy in the home and apartments I’ve owned or rented. I’ve maintained and respected each one. After a wonderful superintendent left my first Brooklyn apartment—a rental—he was replaced by a slob. Before my dinner company came I’d shine the brass elevator doorknob in the lobby and on my floor.
The only answer I can come up with to level the mortgage playing field is to endorse an initiative that removes the stigma about renting an apartment or home and stop glorifying home/apartment ownership. Owning a home is not necessary as is a chicken in every pot. And we have hardly solved the hunger problems here.
The government is putting out mixed signals by punishing those who have worked hard to maintain their credit ratings and have saved to accumulate a substantial down payment.
Is it mean to wonder whether a family that’s unable to save a substantial downpayment and pay bills on time will be able to maintain their home and pay their mortgage?
What ideas do you have that might give a leg up to some while not penalizing those who did things according to Hoyle?