Service of Pets V: NYC Pitches In

October 19th, 2026

Categories: Inflation, Pets

This is a friend’s cat, Josette.

Caramelli cat, Cassie dog, Prunella the almost dachshund and Cat were my love animals. I’m lucky to live in a building overflowing with dogs to pat in lobby and elevator. A walk around residential city neighborhoods is a treat especially at traditional dog walking hours.

The thought of being forced to give up a beloved family member for lack of funds to feed him or her would have broken my heart. Those who have been blessed with furry family members can’t imagine life without them. But if budgets are stretched to the breaking point, feeding them becomes impossible. Losing a source of comfort at such a sad time is cruel.

Today NYC is launching a program to deter this potential heartbreak. The Mayor, NYC Council, Mayor’s Office of Animal Welfare and Department of Social Service are funding free pet food at 22 city food pantries in the boroughs. Halleluiah!

I suspect if pets have not enhanced your life, you might think this is a waste of money. I think it’s a humane and wonderful improvement.

Caramelli cat took advantage of the spring sun in upstate New York.

Service of What a Difference a Day [or Poll] Makes

October 15th, 2026

Categories: Death Penalty, Right to Life

I’d planned to write a post today about the gruesome December live-streamed public execution by firing squad of Nidal Hasan, former U.S. Army psychiatrist who killed colleagues at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. Firing squad and streaming were ordered by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

This morning the president put the kybosh on the streaming. I guess it’s too much to ask him to deep six the firing squad. It’s so 19th century third world. While he’s at it, he might question the judgment of the mastermind for such a ferocious idea.

Might this poll have something to do with the decision? “A new ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll finds 80% of Americans oppose live‑streaming the firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan, while a slim majority (53%) support the execution itself,” according to AI.

Also, “Countries that currently allow execution by firing squad include China, North Korea, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Yemen, Belarus, Nigeria, Somalia, Uganda, Qatar, the UAE, Oman, and parts of the United States such as Utah and South Carolina.”

Chris Nesi wrote in The New York Post: “Death penalty for murderers now supported by 66% of Americans — as Trump looks to expand eligibility.” He reported: “According to a new Pew Research poll, 66% of Americans said they either ‘strongly favor’ (30%) or ‘somewhat favor’ (36%) the death penalty for those convicted of murder.”

AI reports: “As of May 2026, 42% of U.S. adults identify as ‘pro-life.’” I wonder how many of them land in the yes column for capital punishment.

Once a proponent of the death penalty for beastly, dastardly crimes I changed my mind about 30 years ago. What do you think of it? Does a firing squad give you pause?

Service of New York City and State on a Tear

October 12th, 2026

Categories: City Living, MTA, New York City, Subway, Theatre, Transportation, Vote

All of a sudden, I noticed a bunch of things that inspired this post. Kudos, New York!

I just wrote about two consumer protection initiatives that apply only to New York: a law banning personalized pricing so a company can’t spy on consumers to determine how much to overcharge and the click to cancel rule for NYC. This makes it as easy to cancel as to order subscriptions.

A printed information guide for the midterm elections that’s sent registered voters by NYC Votes is clearly written, not in the convoluted, confusing voice of some lawyers that we used to struggle through. In addition to the standard foreign languages, it’s available in Arabic, Haitian Creole, Hindi, Polish, Punjabi, Russian and Urdu.

Last week I discovered I’d lost my OMNY card, a contactless “tap‑and‑pay” fare system for NYC’s subway, buses, and other MTA services.It must have slipped out of my handbag as I left the bus. Because I have automatic renewal, I blocked the account until I could get to one of the subway stations that offer replacement cards. Customer service on the phone worked like a dream. My suggestion is that there be additional venues to get replacement cards. I was on the upper east side and my nearest choices were the 125th or 42nd Street subway stations. Thank goodness for Apple Wallet that paid for transport to Grand Central.

Congrats to the Imperial Theatre on Broadway where I recently attended a [fabulous] show. One of my friends wields a walker. The ushers became a team of professional guardian angels—one announcing our arrival via walkie talkie to others inside. We were expertly guided to our seats.

“A nice place to visit but I wouldn’t want to live there,” will never go away. I love it here and am filled with pride when things work as they have been lately.

Have you noticed an uptick in service where you live?

Service of Price Gouging: It’s Not Caused by Tariffs and Wars Alone

October 8th, 2026

Categories: Inflation, Price Gouging, Prices, Tariff, Travel Tips

I heard an eye-opening segment on Brian Lehrer’s morning show on WNYC recently where he interviewed Lindsay Owens, the executive director of the Groundwork Collaborative and the author of a new book “Gouged: The End of a Fair Price–and What That Means for Your Wallet.” 

Her mission is to restore honesty to the economy.

Some highlights of their conversation follow.

Her findings illustrate that inflation doesn’t only fall at the feet of tariffs and war. Pricing is carefully calibrated to reflect how much a company can get away with. Using AI and other tech aids companies are reinventing the ripoff. Pricing is now a highly scientific engineered skill. Loyalty programs and junk fees raise prices.

Did you know that on rainy days, children’s museums charge more as does Expedia when potential customers log on from wealthy zip codes? Walmart has applied for a patent to allow smartphone technology to add to the price of mayo when a customer puts tuna on the shopping list.

She wrote about an initiative in collaboration with Consumer Reports involving Instacart. Some 400 volunteers ordered the same 23 items like eggs and cereal and the prices were different –as much as 23 percent–for 75 percent of the items. Two weeks after the report was published Instacart stopped running the experiment.

What’s to be done? She praised a law that’s ready for NY Governor Kathy Hochul to sign that bans the “creepy” practice of personalized pricing which allows a company to spy on consumers to decide how much to overcharge each. She said there was some movement in other states.

Lehrer and Owens congratulated New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection Commissioner Samuel A.A. Levine for the first “Click to Cancel” rule, which bans subscription traps, making it as easy to cancel as to sign up. She called the practice “set it and forget it.”

On the program, she described a landlord price fixing algorithm and one that impacted the cost of gas.

Shopping shouldn’t be exhausting, she said. There should be a Shopper’s Bill of Rights as proposed by her Groundwork Collaborative, “a proposed 12‑point set of consumer protections aimed at curbing hidden fees, dynamic/surveillance pricing, and barriers to cancellations in today’s tech‑driven marketplace.”

“AI should work for consumers, not companies,” she said.

Have you suspected this all along or are Owens’s findings news to you?

Service of Icy Hosts

October 5th, 2026

Categories: Brutality, Deportation, Detention, immigrant

A friend shared a horrendous story the highlights of which I post here. Like the protagonist, my father was a legal immigrant with green card for many years, but I would hope anyone reading what happened to this man recently would shudder regardless of personal proximity to an immigrant.

The nightmare began with a knock on the door—the man and his wife were sleeping–in a southern city where they had retired. In his 70s—tall, thin, dark brown skin and an accent—he had been in the country for 35 years. He and his American wife have two kids, one a doctor the other a lawyer. Soon after his detainment he was sent to a jail in another city. In this prison he contracted pneumonia and barely survived a stint in the ICU only to be sent back to prison in a room with seven others.

Before I go on, some context.

Beth Schwartzapfel and Anna Flagg reported in The Marshall Project in August, 2026 … “even as Trump’s enforcement upends lives and livelihoods in immigrant communities, the number of people detained and deported falls far short of the president’s goal of deporting 1 million people per year.

“In total, since Trump’s inauguration last year, ICE has detained over 610,000 people — more than the population of Atlanta, Baltimore, Milwaukee or the entire state of Wyoming.”

According to the headline for a June, 2025 article by David J. Bier of the Cato Institute, “65 Percent of People Taken by ICE Had No Convictions, 93 Percent No Violent Convictions.”

Back to this unfortunate man who finally had a hearing at the end of September.

My friend wrote: “His crime? He made a mistake on his yearly green card application four years ago. The subsequent three years were correct.  So he was sentenced to return to his country of origin. He does have a brother there who will help.”

I interrupt the narrative to point out that we shrug at people in office with far worse “crimes” than once making a mistake on paperwork.

To continue, this is how we treat people we deport.

My friend wrote, “he was taken from the prison in one town to the airport in another wearing prison pajamas and no socks or shoes. He was put in a holding pen with quite a few other men. Hours of no food or water or toilets and he wasn’t able to bring anything that was in his suitcase. On the plane still with no shoes or socks. This is what a law- abiding person with a legal right to be here gets for a ‘mistake’ on an application that no one told him about four years ago.”

The man had “all sorts of legal help as well as his congressman,” wrote my friend. Could his treatment have been worse? I guess. Originally, he was slated to be sent to one of two countries with no connection to him where he didn’t speak the languages.

Is there any rationale or excuse for such inhumane treatment of innocents or any prisoners?

Service of Air Pollution

October 1st, 2026

Categories: Automobiles, Pollution

Decades ago, we were in a severe traffic jam outside Orly Airport. The plan was to return our rental car after a glorious vacation and catch a flight home.

After a while our eyes started to tear up and we were coughing so we closed the windows. We were spoiled by the clean air standards that had been adopted in the States and were shocked at how quickly we reacted to the exhaust. France hadn’t yet taken such steps.

This memory haunted me when I read about the administration’s reversal of federal fuel economy standards that may “increase carbon dioxide emissions by roughly 50% and worsen local air pollution,” according to AI.

The rationale is to lower the price of vehicles, a tempting if short-term gain and a big price to pay. It mocks the congestion pricing program NYC implemented to lower pollution and untangle gridlock.

Are you willing to pay a little more for your next car to maintain the goal of fuel efficiency from 50 miles per gallon, which it is now, to 34.9 by 2031?

Service of Tricky Friendships

September 28th, 2026

Categories: Charity, Compassion, Ethics, Friendship, Stealing

“My Friend Pocketed the Money From Our Charity Event. What Should I Do?,” was the headline of a recent New York Times Ethicist column.

The reader wrote: “My friend took the lead on creating wonderful things for us to sell (in addition to regular donations), and we advertised heavily about the charity we were fund-raising for, which energized everyone to contribute more because of how relevant it felt.”

They didn’t create a bank account for the event and the friend said he’d deposit the money in his account. The fellow subsequently lost his job and ghosted her for a year when she reached out to get back the money.

The reader concluded with these questions for columnist Kwame Anthony Appiah: “What do I owe my friend and what do I owe everyone who donated? Should I, being fortunate enough to have a well-paying job, suck it up and donate the amount myself? Should I let the friendship die, knowing that he essentially stole from a charitable cause?”

A partial excerpt of Appiah’s advice: “Your compassion for your friend is admirable, but personal misery isn’t an excuse for robbing a charity. Nor should you continue to conceal his misconduct in order to preserve your friendship. This man hasn’t just failed to pay up; he has betrayed everyone who organized the event and trusted him to send the money on, and he has let down everyone who bought something or donated, as well as the cause you were all supporting.”

Have you run into a thorny situation like this?

Service of Self Storage 2

September 24th, 2026

Categories: Seasons, Storage

The top four drawers of the mule chest are faux. The chest opens from the top. The chest holds a ton of clothes.

Tis the season for those who live in small spaces with too many clothes to make the dreaded seasonal changeover. My antique mule chest will hold my summer clothes once I remove them from the closet to make room for the winter things currently inside. I try to give away some clothes on each such occasion but never enough.

Our last moves from a house and large apartment to a small apartment in two months was like taking apart a Russian nesting doll, from bigger to smaller, at high speed. As I mentioned in an April 2019 post, my husband suggested we consider putting some things in storage. I was determined not to do that because I doubted that we’d move to a larger apartment or to a country house anytime soon or ever.

Kousha Navidar, guest host of The Brian Lehrer Show on WNYC interviewed New Yorker staff writer David Owen, who had written an article about self-storage. Navidar called the segment “What’s in Your Storage Locker?” The cliff note summary of Owen’s article from AI: It “frames self‑storage as a modern American ritual, parallel to religion, driven by accumulation and the desire to ‘hold’ possessions without using them.” In the interview Owen listed the D reasons for using the storage units: Death, Displacement, Divorce, Downsizing and Delusion that children will want stuff.

A friend uses units to store thousands of books. I never asked if she or her husband visits them. We gave away ours. Ouch. Thank goodness for e-books.

I think the units have their place for short periods as a bridge while waiting for a closing on a house or condo. Otherwise, bite the bullet. It’s no fun to leave behind favorite things. I’m the worst at it. But currently I have enough around that makes me happy and I’m grateful.

Do you use storage units?

Service of Don’t Do What Meghan Did

September 21st, 2026

Categories: Loyalty

In an attempt to follow a news story that doesn’t make my heart sink–hard to do these days–I’ve been weaving in and out of the Meghan/Harry move back to the UK saga on social media—especially the Meghan part.

I wondered if I only saw negative coverage because of some algorithm and checked with AI. I hadn’t been misled. Here’s what it said: “Mainstream British press outlets are overwhelmingly critical or sensationalist regarding Meghan Markle, with virtually no major UK newspaper or tabloid adopting a consistently pro-Meghan stance.”

I could have told her where she dug her hole and why she’s disliked. It’s never a good idea to knock your loved one’s country of origin even if he isn’t a member of the royal family. It can’t be so great on a personal level but to blab about your dislike publicly…ouch.

Mom’s many French friends used to tease her. They’d say they didn’t know who/what she loved more: Her French husband or France. Long after dad died, she returned to France every year for about a month, well into her 80s. If she’d had the energy, she could have met her friends, their children and grandchildren three meals a day. She was American, not always a favorite nationality of citizens of La République française. Her loyalty to their compatriot and country—and upbeat personality–did the trick.

Meghan didn’t have to go as far as mom, but she should have zipped her lip. There are millions of mixed marriages, some religious, others that combine spouses from different countries. My unsolicited advice to them is don’t do what Meghan did. Your thoughts?

Service of Ai Yi Yi 

September 17th, 2026

Categories: Uncategorized

We take a lot for granted and depend on the expertise of others. We believe that a restaurant keeps a clean kitchen, and cooks know the difference between rat poison and sugar; a car repair service’s experts fix brakes; clinicians develop safe and effective vaccines, and a doctor knows how to read an MRI.

That’s why I can only line up on the issue of AI with those who either themselves are steeped in the subject or others with topnotch advisors. Many urge for an immediate heads up.

A loud voice declaring “Hoax,” with no information backing the word, uttered from a person who does no research and doesn’t listen to those who do, doesn’t give me confidence.

When the lineup on the other side is impressive, and urges us to stop to assess, check the development of something that could lead to what Bernie Sanders called “catastrophic consequences,” I’m with them. The fellow who previously suggested a spoonful of Clorox could cure Covid doesn’t impress.

In addition to Sanders, Steve Bannon raises a red flag. Amanda Castro quoted Bannon in a Newsweek article: “by calling AI ‘the defining issue of our time,’ insisting the country must ‘slow down the pace’ before the technology outstrips human oversight.”

They are joined by the heads of AI companies urging a slowdown. Max Zahn wrote for ABCnews.com, “Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published a blog post alerting the public to ‘serious’ risks. Sam Altman, chief executive at rival firm OpenAI, in a post on X acknowledged AI could go ‘very badly.’

“The head of xAI, Elon Musk, echoed that view, referring to a post on X from 2014 in which he said AI could prove more dangerous than nuclear weapons.”

Few dispute that AI has tremendous potential for the benefit of, for example, medical research and business efficiency. But that is not the focus of this post.

What do you think? Is the hullabaloo over AI a hoax or should we take a breath to assess before it’s too late?

Get This Blog Emailed to You:
Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz